Donate and Support ATP!

ATP LIVE

[UPDATE] Feb 2, 2017 - ATP Live is on Indefinite Hiatus. [YouTube Announcement]

Watch ATP LIVE! Every Thursday at 8pm PST.

Our Friends

« MvC3: Shuma-Gorath Combo Video By Desk | Main | Site News: We Have A Winner! »
Monday
Mar142011

Crush System: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, an article by Slips

An interesting article written for our site by STL's Slips. If you are interested in writing for our site and are not a retard, contact me at aris@avoidingthepuddle.com.


     There is a lot of controversy that hovers around the crush system in Tekken, and in this article I want to share my views and opinions on it.  Why it’s good, why it’s bad…and why it’s ugly.

The Good: The crush system is extremely necessary.  It would just be way too hard to get in on your opponents without it.  I first realized the need for a crush system in Tekken Tag Tournament (TTT) when playing my friend Shaun who most people know as Unconkable.  He was backdashing as much as Bambi’s mom when she saw a gun.  Whenever I would get close enough to hit him, he would either throw out a jab or duckjab, and there wasn’t a whole lot I could do about it.  I couldn’t whiff punish a jab or duckjab practically; those moves simply recover too fast.  I also couldn’t really counter-hit them effectively either.  Since they were the fastest moves in the game, they would simply beat out everything I had.

 All I could really do is let them whiff and put on a generic guessing game of d+4 or a quick mid poke, which didn’t really help if I was down by 70 points and there was only 20 seconds left in the round.  It was beyond frustrating.  It was like the first time I tried to catch that that stupid bunny sitting in front of the Lethal Lava Land painting in Mario64.  It was then I truly realized why Mishimas and Ogres were top tier in that game, because there were the only ones who could put a strong guessing game on a backdashing opponent mashing out safe pokes when a threat was near. 

I next realized the need for it in Tekken 4 (T4) when I lost to a Paul scrub doing nothing but jab.  Since block stun had little to no push-back in that game and backdash was nerfed, I couldn’t really get away from it.  Since the jab gave him +1 frame advantage, I didn’t really have a move fast enough to beat the jabs either playing with Eddy, so I had no choice but to duck.  But even ducking and doing a while standing move to punish seemed too challenging, especially when the single jab was mixed up with 1,2.  I later learned you could sidewalk in between jabs, but it all just seemed so impractical at the time.  Why was the simplest stuff so hard to beat? 

So when I heard Tekken 5 was introducing a “crush system”, where most jump moves would automatically beat low moves and most low moves would automatically beat high moves, I was very pleased to hear the news.  One of the problems I had in TTT and T4 would now have an easy solution that made sense.  And guess what.  It worked.  The problems went away and it was with great relief.  Like paying off a big credit card debt, you just didn’t have to worry about it anymore.  I scoffed at the people who abused the old game’s systems to achieve victory over me and smiled with an evil laugh.  So before I go into any rant about the crush system and its flaws, I must say this was a positive step Namco-Bandai made in the progression of Tekken.  It should not by any means be taken out.  It was a great idea that should be praised as the correct course of action to solve a problem of the past, but there is definitely room for improvement.

The Bad:  As I embellished and thrived in T5, I noticed that every once in a while, my newly acquired friend and pet known as the crush system would occasionally turn on me. I began to get really frustrated at one move in particular.  Hop kick.  Whenever I had frame advantage and thought I had my opponent conditioned enough to not move and open up the option for me to go low, I was getting killed.  The hop kick of course was beating my low despite being at advantage.  I was not only wrong with my initial instinct and guessed wrong, but getting horribly punished as well.  The pet I thought I once controlled suddenly turned into a wild animal, and I was only allowed to embrace it under certain circumstances, and if I tried to go beyond those circumstances, the wild animal would bite. 

Since this was an implementation of the new crush system, I kept an open mind and would remind myself how annoying things were without the crush system.    How it was so hard to attack in TTT and how too good frame advantage was in T4.  But I soon learned it was usual practice for all to mash out hop kicks when the pressure was on.  The words ‘frame advantage’ were known to the natives as a good thing, a thing to be cherished and sought after.  But it was those very words that the natives were dying by.  Like a withering old man slowly being poisoned by his ever-trusting wife with every meal she serves.

And why not mash hop kick?  Hop kick combos were now as good as any with the new juggle systems.  If they were blocked, the punishment wasn’t too bad, and most of the times you got hit during the hop kick you were airborne and received minimal damage with minor wake-ups.  Being bit by the wild beast became as mundane and painful as the long and treacherous commute to and from work every day.  You just learned to accept it.

The table had turned from frame advantage being too good in T4, to nearly irrelevant in T5 and T6.  The only time you can safely attack with frames in the newer Tekken’s is +7 on up.  Attacking with anything less than +7 is taking a pretty big risk.  That risk, is what leads us to…

The Ugly:  Guessing wrong while having frame advantage would not be so grotesque if the consequence was not so severe.  Since you have advantage, the odds are in your favor to actually guess right.  However, in the off chance you guess wrong, you are most likely launched and could potentially be on your way to losing the entire round.  All because you wanted to take advantage of your frame advantage?  Just doesn’t make sense.

In order for the player with frame advantage to fully utilize his advantage he must use quick moves.  Usually the mix up is between; a) quick mid, typically being d/f+1.  b) Quick low poke which usually varies depending on the character.  c) Jabs.  While these 3 options cover the basis of increasing your odds of guessing right, they typically do little damage (character dependant of course).  And while the odds are not in the favor of the player without frames to guess right, the reward for when they do guess right are so great that it is worth trying for nearly every time.  To the point where it skews the reasoning of relying on the good old fashion form of defense of simply blocking correctly.

Most top players shy away of utilizing frame advantage these days, which I think personally, is a shame.  Many mind games were put forth in the old games with frame advantage; you could actually see what players were thinking.  You were not guessing if they panicked, had a hunch you were going low, needed a fast mid-hitting move, or knew exactly what you were doing to begin with.  Like I said before, the crush system was necessary, but with the combination of sidewalk and other moves having evasive properties, it has turned the once proud art of poking into a snafu of randomness.  It has changed the game that once rewarded a player’s knowledge, instincts and fundamentals, into a game that now rewards chance, haphazardness and desperation.

The Horizon: I personally believe the crush system only needs some minor tweaks to make the poking game less “random” and more adequate.   As the great JOP so eloquently put many years ago, “Crush moves should not double as launchers.”  It’s one thing to desperately throw out a crush move to get out of a bad situation, but to be rewarded with such high damage combos is just a bit too extreme.  “It’s like you always have 2 bars and an ultra.”  JOP said using Super Street Fighter 4 as an analogy.  The player who achieved gaining the situation of having frame advantage should not be deterred by his opponent’s desperate acts of panic.  These are just a few ideas, any of which would suffice, that would help make things better.

1)       Hop kicks should not launch.  Most characters that have a hop kick have a d/f+2 that is just as fast and yields the same damage, so the loss of being able to punish without them is easily just replaced with d/f+2’s. 

2)       Another solution is to allow hop kicks to still launch but not crush moves.  Make characters have universal crush moves more like Asuka’s 3+4, Eddy’s u+4, Jack’s u/f+1, Bruce’s u/f+3, Dragunov’s u/f+3, ect.  These moves do damage and still serve the same purpose of getting out of bad situations but are not followed by outrageous combos to compound the reward of desperation.

3)       Hop kicks only launch on counter-hit.  Most of the time when at frame disadvantage a low poke is ‘crushed’ but not getting counter-hit, it is usually upon its whiff that it gets hit.  This may be just enough to make things tolerable.

So there you have it.  Just to re-iterate, the crush system was and still is a good idea.  It’s just the game done a 180 in terms of who truly has the advantage when it comes to frame advantage and needs to find a medium ground.

Thanks for reading,

 

-Slips

 



EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (41)

Hey my schlong

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 12:07 PM | Unregistered CommenterMokujin

good read.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 12:32 PM | Unregistered Commentersab

Nice post. I would also suggest making hopkicks more punishable on block.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterRoncock

This is something i struggled with for a while, getting launched for being on plus frames.. so frustrating.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 1:16 PM | Unregistered CommenterDiabolic

I gotta agree, the hop kick combo damage is unreasonable. Well written article.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM | Unregistered Commenternoquarter

i think the worst thing about these most recent games is exactly that, not having real frame advantage that is nearly guaranteed to award you with at the very least, momentum

hopkicks are the most frustrating thing in tekken 5/6 as jop and slips said and imo should not be launching unless theyre roughly (very roughly) 50% slower than they are now

sometimes i wish this game dealt with lows more like soul calibur 2 did. if the tekken team could find a way to make it more like that it would be a much better game for everyone.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 2:01 PM | Unregistered Commenterjom

Totally agree. The idea behind the crush system is good but the execution is flawed. The risk/reward is just too good which makes the game more random than it needs. Seriously, I almost feel bad when I launch people, but what's worse and what hasn't been mentioned in the article is that some hopkicks beat out even mids and highs as well. Fucking stupid.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 2:15 PM | Unregistered CommenterSmith

Great read. I agree with pretty much everything said here. They kind of already took a step in the right direction with Jin's hopkick. Problem is, that's JUST Jin's hopkick. People like Lili and King will still absolutely murder you off of hop kick juggles. And then it's even easier for them to get you to a wall to further rape your face with their fists thanks to the bound system.

Only thing I feel you missed out on are the sort of "mid crushing" moves like Lars's u/f3. There's quite a few of these moves in the game and I believe Aris has mentioned it on one of the podcast episodes. There needs to be consistency in this thing, but when you have a large amount of moves that go "under" mids AND launch you for it? On top of that, deal with that shit while using a character with some really shitty mid hitboxes (Marduk). It just becomes incredibly rage inducing.

Once again, good stuff Slips. Hope to see more articles like this on the site.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 2:45 PM | Unregistered CommenterMannyBiggz

present this article to harada?

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 3:16 PM | Unregistered CommenterWing

yeah aris with how much feedback you guys are able to give to harada and the tekken team it would be awesome if you could have this shown to him.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 4:17 PM | Unregistered Commenterjom

He speaks the truth. The crush system has its pro's n con's. What do you think Aris? What are your opinions?

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM | Unregistered CommenterIMFAMOUSMINDED

For the most part I agree with Slips. However I think high crush moves are ok. I just think low crush moves should not launch for full damage. I like games to promote lows and predicting/jumping lows. This is probably because I come from a Soul Calibur background.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 4:23 PM | Registered CommenterAris

The developers of Tekken are like physiological warfare scientists. It's very understandable how the crush system can feel like bullshit sometimes. I believe it often times can be more of an experience issue rather than weird "off" mind games. Tekken isn't all about mids and low mix ups, there is more to it than that. It be hard to adjust the crush system. Without the crush system or even some of it, people will choose to play super safe. The kind of safe I mean is the kind where players can start "flow charting" mix ups.

Tekken is a hard game to learn because players don't realize how much freedom they exactly have. I love how in Tekken 6 there is almost ALWAYS a way to come back, no matter what the situation is. There are no "checkmates" in Tekken 6, the only exception to that rule is if your already in a juggle, being ready to be finished off.

There are lows that + on hit AND force the enemy to FC. Man the fuck that shit, a hopkick conditions the opponent not abuse lows too much. But it works vice versa,

Backdashing, sidestepping/sidewalking, blocking, using a mid/high at advantage will beat a hop kick. Hopkicks usually don't have good range. Some hopkicks are better than others, but it may be like that just for balancing purposes.

Movement in Tekken is just so flexible and it beats so many stuff. Tekken ain't no mid low mix up game. Tekken is about mind games. You need to keep in mind while it might be slightly easy to throw out random stuff, it's also VERY easy to bait them as well.

When it comes to lows, low pokes that give a lot of + on hit can be very annoying, it's not the amount of damage that's annoying, it's the fact that they might go for another one. It's simply one of those times where I'm so glad a hopkick can launch them.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 4:39 PM | Unregistered CommenterDeadlywolf

I agree that you shouldn't be able to crush from frame disadvantage, crushes should only work from 0+/-, or maybe +1. With the current crush system, we have bullshit like Law's d+2,3 and Lars' uf+3 which you can just throw out whenever you feel your opponent is going to try a high_low mixup. Sure, they're both launch punishable in block, but I still think they're very frustrating moves that limit MY options when I'M at an advantage, which is just wrong. They could add some sort of startup to a crush move, it should not be instant like it's right now. Also, If hopkicks should crush but shouldn't launch on normal hit, I guess they could behave like Law's and Hei's u+4. Both knock down on normal hit for 14 damage, but launch only on CH.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 5:16 PM | Unregistered Commenterloldongs

excellent read

please get this to the tekken team.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 5:16 PM | Unregistered Commenterphunnykidd

I absolutely hate how hop kicks work in this game. Especially since none of my characters have a substantial one, they are just way to good. I absolutely dispise getting launched when I should have momentum.....

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 6:37 PM | Unregistered CommenterThe devil kazuya

Hopkicks don't crush lows until the 9th frame

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 8:01 PM | Unregistered CommenterReality

I didn't have any gripes with Lars's u/f+3... until I discovered that it crushes highs, lows, and some mids from the very FIRST FRAME. That is just beyond stupid despite how punishable the move is. Why would a move that has really good range and tracks decently need to crush 90% of the move list from the very first frame?

I agree with this for the most part. Another suggestion is to lower the damage or property of the hopkick significantly, kinda like Jin's hopkick or Dragunov's u/f+4. The former barely does 60 damage max and you can't do that max damage juggle if you hit the hopkick from max range, the latter being a nice chunk of damage with very little to no wall carry opportunities.

Monday, March 14, 2011 at 8:45 PM | Unregistered CommenterThe Invincible

I like hop kicks and I love the crush system. It makes people stop spamming and attacking like they are stupid and actually play carefully. With the advent of walls the crush system is even more necessary as any person with their back against the way would be fucked if a person just stood there and + framed them to death. The game is balanced because its a guess game between high low and medium. If you take or limit the high crush then people won't be able to punish and crush people for spamming LAUNCHING lows. If your gonna take away Hop kicks as launchers then take away all lauchers because I'll be damned if I'm gonna sit there and let some noon d+1 me to death on the wall and not punish the shit out of him for it.The crush system works. There are moves that go under highs and launch and highs and crush lows and launch. Hopefully what slips wants never gets implemented. I can't believe he even played tekken 4. Thats not even a tekken game. The engine is so alien feels like a aborted virtua fighter.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011 at 12:07 AM | Unregistered CommenterSchematic

I agree 100% with this. T6 rewards desperation.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011 at 2:05 AM | Unregistered Commenterboff

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>